Javascript is not activated in your browser. This website needs javascript activated to work properly.
You are here

Blog post: Reflections on this year’s Association of American Geographers’ conference by Maja Essebo.

This year’s Association of American Geographers’ conference got me thinking about maps. I’ve been to a fair few geography conferences but, funny enough, have never really come across very many maps. Or, rather, have given them very little thought. This year, wherever I turned there they were. And they were truly, deeply, mind-bogglingly fascinating. I’d like to share with you some of the maps and people I came across. 
Washington AAG

Eric Holder, the 82ndAttorney General of the United States, gave the keynote address. Talking to a room full of geographers he took the safe route, stating ‘I love maps’ (applause) ‘I do, I love them!’ (more applause). 

But maps are not only a proclaimed love of Mr Holder’s, they’re at the very centre of his current job as Chairman of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC) which aims to tackle gerrymandering.

What struck me, though, was not that he argued for dealing with the truly problematic practice of gerrymandering, but that he made it sound like something new and exclusively Republican when, truly, it’s neither. It goes back to 1812 when Elbridge Gerry, Governor of Massachusetts, created a new districting plan for the Massachusetts Senate and it’s been a contentious issue ever since.  Here’s a paper published in 1966 on the geographical aspects of gerrymandering,here’s one from 1985 discussing gerrymandering and proportional representation, and here’sa really interesting one from 2016, showing that the much critiqued 2012 election, when Democratic candidates won only 201 of the 435 House seats despite getting the overall majority of votes nationwide, was only negligibly effected by gerrymandering. 

That’s on a national level, though. On a state level, gerrymandering has had detrimental consequences and there’s no denying that one side of the political aisle has been far better at it than the other. But not necessarily for lack of trying. It’s not a matter of one (corrupt) side doing it and the other (virtuous) side trying to put it to an end, that’s a blatant and deeply unhelpful case of othering. Binary thinking, ones and zeros, you’re either this or you’re that and that one thing defines you. 

It reminds me a bit of the maps by Ste Kinney-Fields of what it would look like if only [insert category here] voted. Well-intended, deeply fascinating, and horribly misused. The one of only women voting spread like wildfire across social media. It seemed to reaffirm the notion that women are just so much more sensible, so much less prone to hyperbole. There would be no wars if women were in charge. It’s taking the maddening complexity of human beings and simmering it down until only dregs remain, calling it essence without ever thinking of what got lost in the process. Yes, there would be wars if women were in charge.   


The next map experience I’d like to share with you is the project Mapping Southerness. As part of the Southbound project, it aims to encapsulate the very quintessence of the American South, ultimately aiming to answer the question ‘where is the South’? They created a series of interactive maps based on features and practices deemed, somehow, typically southern, including ‘chickens’, ‘churches’, and subscriptions to the magazine ‘Garden & Gun’ (I looked it up, it’s a magazine about food, travel, and art, but that also contains such gems as ‘Are paper shotgun shells ripe for a revival: why some shooters are ready for a blast from the past’). The maps show each category separately as well as the aggregate, or what they term ‘The Index of Southernness’. Presenting it to local communities, people often felt reaffirmed in where the real South is and, equally, where it isn’t: ‘I’ve always said Grady County ain’t Southern!’ A beautiful and never-ending loop of mapping place and placing maps. 

Finally, meet Anja NovkovićShe spent three years mapping the minute and mundane practices taking place in a little alleyway in downtown Montréal. In the context of urban renewal, she chose to ask ‘what’s already there?’ She gave a talk that took me from thinking ‘you did what for three years?’ to being convinced that the woman is simply brilliant. One of those things I wish I had the creativity, resolve, and artistic talent to do myself. Her maps include rat sightings, crying, smoking, hugging, and the occasional murder. With her permission, I’ll end this map musing with two of the maps she presented during her talk. 



Anja Novković map

Map by Anja Novković AAG

Klick on the image for a larger version. Maps by: Anja Novković

Maja Essebo

Maja Essebo is a researcher at Lund University Centre for Sustainability Science (LUCSUS). She has a master in political science from Lund University and a PhD in human geography from Gothenburg University. Her research background covers a wide range of issues, including transition to sustainable mobility, urban laboratories, and, first and foremost, all things related to the (political) use of myth. Her current project focuses on the role of myth in American environmental politics.

Maja Essebo
maja [dot] essebo [at] LUCSUS [dot] lu [dot] se

Postdoctoral fellow at LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)

About the Conference

 AAG Annual Meeting was held in WASHINGTON, DC, April 3 - April 7 2019


Latest news

8 October 2020

Environmental claims and social needs clash in Louisiana’s coastal wetlands

Environmental claims and social needs clash in Louisiana’s coastal wetlands
7 October 2020

How will climate movements continue to shape the future?

How will climate movements continue to shape the future?
6 October 2020

Lund University Future Week 12-18 October

Lund University Future Week 12-18 October
5 October 2020

The uncertain future of negative emission technologies

The uncertain future of negative emission technologies
29 September 2020

LUCSUS receives grant of SEK 20 million to realise the global sustainable development goals

LUCSUS receives grant of SEK 20 million to realise the global sustainable development goals

P.O. Box 170, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
Phone: +46(0)46- 222 80 81
info [at] lucsus [dot] lu [dot] se