The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Barry Ness

Barry Ness

Senior Lecturer, Docent

Barry Ness

Barriers and opportunities to AE system development: insights from WaterWarmth pilots

Author

  • Nthabi Mohlakoana
  • Sara Brogaard
  • Barry Ness
  • Annsofie Micallef Nilsson
  • Thomas Hoppe

Summary, in English

The main research question that guides the analysis for this Work Package 6 Deliverable 6.3 report is: What are the barriers and opportunities that govern niche development and scaling of aqua thermal energy (AE)
systems? In answering this research question, we map and analyze the enabling policy and opportunities
that support AE system niche development, as well as policy that can also play a role in up-scaling and outscaling
of AE systems and practices through demonstration pilots. The report also identifies barriers that
(could potentially) hinder AE system niche development. The focus of the report is on the AE pilots of the
Interreg North Sea WaterWarmth Project and is therefore primarily based on interviews and pilot text
documents. We compiled a set of key questions that were designed to explore issues related to governance
and implementation of renewable energy systems. For this report we particularly explored issues about the
tensions and challenges faced by the pilots as well as enabling factors that lead to successes in the
implementation and scaling of their projects. We studied nine pilot projects using an exploratory multi-case
study approach. The first questions for mapping the AE projects were asked to the pilots in an on-line online
survey April 2024. A workshop was then held in Caen May 2024 and in the next step semi-structured
interviews were carried out with key respondents involved in the nine pilots during the Fall of 2024. The
results are first analyzed case-by-case, and then a multi-case synthesis is presented followed by conclusions
and policy recommendations.
Results show that all the nine pilot projects have experienced several barriers that hinder AE niche
development but also referred to important enablers. Policy and regulation barriers were observed in all
cases. Lack of clear policy and regulations included complex regulations and inconsistent policies for AE
systems. Working closely with policy and governance stakeholders was regarded as an enabling factor in
developing the projects, especially at the early phases. Having no internal vision was considered a barrier as
it leads to difficulty in formulating a business plan that in turn may hinder securing funding. Lack of financial
support is in turn one of the key barriers for the projects having challenges in securing bank guarantees for
equipment and operation costs as well as permitting costs. The novelty of the technology in some countries
also created barriers in convincing permitting authorities and finance stakeholders about project viability.
Further, lack of expertise was seen as something that could be overcome through sharing experiences with
similar projects in the same regions or in other countries. Exchange of lessons lead to strengthening of the
project and peer-to-peer feedback. Support of fossil fuels by governments reduces subsidies for innovations
such as AE systems and leads to lack of incentives for adapting AE or large-scale collective energy systems
and is therefore regarded as unfair competition for renewable energy alternatives. Reluctance and lack of
acceptance of AE technology due to skepticism about renewable energy technologies is also a hindrance to
AE development. Finally, lack of public awareness is a related barrier which can partly be attributed to key
stakeholders withholding information that could benefit the projects through information exchange. Regarding
enablers, networks and stakeholder collaboration were regarded as fundamental in the implementation and
success of projects. Good communication with these stakeholders was also seen as a key success and an
enabling factor to ensure a full understanding of the project details and expectations.

Department/s

  • LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)
  • Centre for Advanced Middle Eastern Studies (CMES)
  • MECW: The Middle East in the Contemporary World
  • LU Profile Area: Nature-based future solutions
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate
  • LTH Profile Area: The Energy Transition
  • Centre for Healthy Indoor Environments
  • CIRCLE

Publishing year

2025-04-02

Language

English

Publication/Series

WP 6

Document type

Report

Publisher

Interreg North Sea

Topic

  • Environmental Studies in Social Sciences

Status

Published