Your browser has javascript turned off or blocked. This will lead to some parts of our website to not work properly or at all. Turn on javascript for best performance.

The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Emily Boyd

Emily Boyd

Professor, Director, Docent

Emily Boyd

The Ecological Limits of Poverty Alleviation in an African Forest-Agriculture Landscape

Author

  • Alexandra C. Morel
  • M. Hirons
  • Michael Adu Sasu
  • Marvin Quaye
  • Rebecca Ashley Asare
  • John Mason
  • Stephen Adu-Bredu
  • Emily Boyd
  • Constance L. McDermott
  • Elizabeth J.Z. Robinson
  • Robert Straser
  • Yadvinder Malhi
  • Ken Norris

Summary, in English

Cocoa yields in Ghana remain low. This has variously been attributed to low rates of fertilizer application, pollinator limitation, and particularly dry growing conditions. In this paper we use an African forest-agriculture landscape dominated by cocoa (Theobroma cacao) to develop an ecological production function, allowing us to identify key ecological and management limits acting on cocoa yields simultaneously. These included more consistent application of fertilizers inter-annually, distributing rotting biomass throughout the farm and reducing the incidence of capsid attacks. By relaxing these limits, we estimate plausible increases in yields and, by extension, farm incomes. Our analysis reveals that resulting increases in cocoa yields requiring both ecological and intensive management interventions could be significant (113 ± 60%); however, benefits are disproportionately realized by the wealthiest households. We found that wealthier households benefited proportionally more from ecological intensification methods (e.g., leaving more rotting biomass in their farms) and the poorest households benefited proportionally more from capital-intensive intensification methods (e.g., pesticide and fertilizer applications). We treated poverty as multi-dimensional, and show that only certain dimensions of poverty (school attendance, assets, and food security) are significantly related to cocoa incomes, while several other dimensions (access to clean water, sanitation and electricity, and infant mortality) are not. We explore how increased household cocoa incomes could impact different dimensions of poverty. Our findings suggest, that if all households adopted the optimal level of each of these management options, and in so doing had similar poverty profiles to those households already managing optimally, we would see the community-averaged probability: a child of a household misses school decrease from 47 to 31%, a household would be able to acquire assets increase from 40 to 59% and a household would have access to an adequate amount of food increase from 62 to 79%.

Department/s

  • LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)

Publishing year

2019-07-23

Language

English

Publication/Series

Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

Volume

3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Frontiers Media S. A.

Topic

  • Agricultural Science
  • Ecology

Keywords

  • agroforestry
  • cocoa
  • ecological production function
  • ecosystem services
  • poverty alleviation

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 2571-581X