The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Kimberly Nicholas

Kimberly Nicholas

Professor

Kimberly Nicholas

Legitimizing flying as usual in the climate crisis : techno-economic framing dominates US news media, 2016–2020

Author

  • Sara Ullström
  • Claudia Orellana-Rodriguez
  • Willemijn van Dolen
  • Stevan Rudinac
  • Kimberly Nicholas

Summary, in English

Non-technical summary. How the media talks about climate issues shapes public understanding of these issues. This article explores the news media debate about aviation and climate change in the US between 2016 and 2020. It finds that news coverage focused mostly on industry-led solutions, such as new technology and carbon offsetting. By contrast, reducing demand for flying was given little attention, despite the importance of demand-side action in meeting climate goals for aviation. The study highlights the need for more balanced coverage that includes demand-side perspectives to help shift high-carbon norms alongside technological developments. Technical summary. Media has played an important role in bringing attention to aviation’s climate impact during the past decade. To understand how the media might impact public concern around this issue, it is important to study how it is framed in public discourse. Using topic modeling and network analysis, we investigate the news media debate about aviation and climate change in the US from 2016 to 2020. Based on a sample of 898 news articles collected from the All the News 2.0 dataset, we identify four frames: Technology and economy, Policy and regulation, Lifestyle and youth activism, and Disruptive protest. The dominant frame (Technology and economy) appeared in outlets of all political orientations and aligned with industry perspectives, reinforcing mainstream ideas about aviation’s societal importance and emphasizing technology-focused mitigation strategies that reproduce business as usual. While actors such as Greta Thunberg and Extinction Rebellion were central in elevating alternative frames highlighting the importance of demand reductions, such frames remained relatively marginal. By demonstrating how dominant media frames around aviation and climate change divert attention from demand management, the paper highlights the need for more balanced media coverage that incorporates such perspectives alongside industry-led approaches to support meaningful climate action. Social media summary. US news media downplays cutting air travel demand, favoring industry-led solutions that legitimize aviation growth. © The Author(s), 2026. Published by.

Department/s

  • Department of Service Studies
  • LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)
  • LU Profile Area: Nature-based future solutions
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate

Publishing year

2026

Language

English

Publication/Series

Global Sustainability

Volume

9

Document type

Article

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

Topic

  • Other Social Sciences

Keywords

  • SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
  • SDG 13 - Climate Action

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 2059-4798