Salvatore Paolo de Rosa
Commentary: Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future
Summary, in English
Bradshaw et al. (2021) make a call to action in light of three major crises—biodiversity loss, the sixth mass extinction, and climate disruption. We have no contention with Bradshaw et al.’s diagnosis of the severity of the crises. Yet, their call for scientists to “tell it like it is,” their appeal to political “leaders,” and the great attention they aﬀord to human population growth as a main driver underpinning the three crises, rest on contested assumptions about the role of science in societal transformations, and are scientiﬁcally ﬂawed and politically problematic. In this commentary, we challenge Bradshaw et al.’s assumptions concerning the nature of science, polity, and humanity as well as the implicit politics underlying their analysis and messaging. We end with an alternative call to action.
- LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)
Frontiers in Conservation Science
Journal article (comment)
Frontiers Media S. A.
- Human Geography
- ISSN: 2673-611X