The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

A man, Santiago Gorostiza. Photo.

Santiago Gorostiza

Researcher

A man, Santiago Gorostiza. Photo.

Shared Battlegrounds: War at the Crossroads of Environmental History and the History of Science

Author

  • Santiago Gorostiza

Summary, in English

In recent years, the environmental impact of warfare has made front-page news. Discussions about “ecocide”—a term first proposed in 1970 by Yale biologist Arthur W. Galston to describe the large-scale destruction of ecosystems during the Vietnam War—have come into the spotlight. The preparation and conduct of war, along with the social, economic, and scientific reorganisation that accompany it, offer rich topics for historians of science and technology interested in the environment. At the same time, since the turn of the 21st century, the study of war has emerged as a burgeoning subfield within environmental history. Edmund Russell's War and Nature (2001) inspired extensive scholarly research exploring the direct and indirect impact of military operations on the environment, as well as their legacies for human and non-human life. This review article focuses on how the development of the environmental history of war subfield has intersected with the history of science. First, it highlights how Russell's work has engaged audiences in both the history of science and the history of technology. In its early years, however, the field served as a bridge between environmental history and military history and delved into a classic theme of environmental history: conservation. Second, it discusses how studies on war and environment expanded beyond the battlefield to encompass militarised landscapes and the effects of military supply chains, among other topics. Third, it highlights how research on Cold War science provided a key site for intellectual exchange between environmental history of war and the history of science. Finally, it identifies several research avenues that could foster further collaboration between these fields, including: the concept of ecocide, the study of environmental infrastructure and envirotechnical objects, the epistemic foundations of military environmentalist discourses, and the significance of environmental data production and use in warfare.

Department/s

  • LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)

Publishing year

2025-01

Language

English

Pages

205-234

Publication/Series

Centaurus

Volume

67

Issue

1

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Tech Science Press

Topic

  • Technology and Environmental History
  • History of Science and Ideas

Keywords

  • Environmental history of war
  • History of science
  • Conservation
  • War and Nature
  • Cold War Science
  • Ecocide

Status

Published

Project

  • From military to civil crime: an environmental history of ecocide (FORMAS career grant)

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0008-8994