The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Torsten Krause

Torsten Krause

Senior Lecturer, Deputy Director

Torsten Krause

Inclusion in body and mind : ensuring full participation of Indigenous peoples and local communities in decisions related to nature

Author

  • Suneetha M. Subramanian
  • Eszter Kelemen
  • Alta de Vos
  • Torsten Krause
  • Melissa Mayhew
  • Aroha Mead
  • Emmanuel O. Nuesiri
  • Jessica Perritt
  • Mine Islar
  • Sacha Amaruzaman
  • Gabriela Arroyo-Robles
  • Barbara Nakangu
  • Marina Kosmus
  • Luciana Porter-Bolland
  • Evonne Yiu
  • Anna Varga
Show all

Summary, in English

The inclusion of the knowledge and perspectives of Indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLC) in global sciencepolicy processes are increasingly being mandated. This is indicative of the recognition of their expertise and worldviews to inform social and ecological decisions. The IPBES Values Assessment (VA) explicitly highlighted the necessity for a nuanced engagement of different actors while undertaking valuation for decisions related to nature. In this paper we further reflect on the findings of Chapter 6 of the VA that focused on operationalizing diverse values approaches in policy. We examine how IPLC are consulted and their values included in sectoral and cross-sectoral policies interlinked with biodiversity. We specifically share IPLC experiences of the IPBES process based on personal reflections of a participating Indigenous scholar. Apart from emphasizing the pitfalls of excluding diverse IPLC values of nature from decision making, our review also discusses how IPLC perspectives are represented within global forums, and particularly in IPBES processes. Our analysis reveals that meaningful IPLC inclusion pertains to representation of knowledge (mind) and of active participation and agency to bring their networks into the discourse (body). While highlighting some major deficiencies of the current decision-making practices (e.g., lack of pluralistic and inclusive processes, human and financial resources, or culturally sensitive processes) that preclude the full and effective inclusion of IPLC, we offer promising approaches, specifically engaging reflexivity and learning, that can address these deficiencies and move toward ensuring higher representation of IPLC by and for themselves.

Department/s

  • LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate
  • LU Profile Area: Nature-based future solutions
  • LTH Profile Area: The Energy Transition

Publishing year

2025-08

Language

English

Publication/Series

Ecology and Society

Volume

30

Issue

3

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Resilience Alliance

Topic

  • Human Geography

Keywords

  • biodiversity
  • diverse values
  • equity
  • human rights
  • inclusion
  • Indigenous peoples
  • IPLC
  • local communities
  • marginalized voices
  • plural decision making
  • science-policy assessments
  • social empowerment

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1708-3087