The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Portrait of Jonas Allesson. Photo.

Jonas Allesson

PhD student

Portrait of Jonas Allesson. Photo.

Burying problems? Imaginaries of carbon capture and storage in Scandinavia

Author

  • Lina Lefstad
  • Jonas Allesson
  • Henner Busch
  • Wim Carton

Summary, in English

CO2 management, capturing CO2 from industry processes or removing CO2 from the atmosphere, is increasingly presented as a necessity for climate. Scandinavian countries are at the forefront of developing carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. We reviewed the scientific literature on CCS in Scandinavia to identify and analyse prevalent imaginaries for the role of this technology in the region. Imaginaries capture ideas about the future use of technologies. They are deeply political in that they help define what futures are seen as possible and desirable.
Studying CCS imaginaries can grant insights into how current structures and interests shape future climate mitigation pathways. Our results show that one dominant imaginary defines the scientific debate, which envisions using CCS to preserve the industrial base of the region while seeking to meet climate goals. This dominant imaginary builds its appeal and legitimacy around three main characteristics: 1) scientific authority, which justifies the need for large-scale CCS, 2) greening the industrial regime, which gives it a specific purpose, and 3)
Scandinavian exceptionalism, which mobilises existing infrastructure and regional know-how combined with a narrative of national environmental leadership. We argue that the dominant imaginary limits the way in which the future can be imagined, by framing out remaining uncertainties and alternative ways of lowering emissions. This highlights the importance of open and critical democratic debate about suggested mitigation pathways.

Department/s

  • LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)

Publishing year

2024-05

Language

English

Publication/Series

Energy Research & Social Science

Volume

113

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Political Science
  • Environmental Management

Status

Published

Project

  • Burying problems? Imaginaries of carbon capture and storage in Scandinavia

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 2214-6326