Your browser has javascript turned off or blocked. This will lead to some parts of our website to not work properly or at all. Turn on javascript for best performance.

The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Christine Wamsler

Christine Wamsler

Professor

Christine Wamsler

Using green infrastructure for urban climate-proofing : An evaluation of heat mitigation measures at the micro-scale

Author

  • Teresa Zölch
  • Johannes Maderspacher
  • Christine Wamsler
  • Stephan Pauleit

Summary, in English

Urban green infrastructure (UGI) has been increasingly promoted as a key measure to mitigate heat stress in cities caused by the urban heat island effect and climate change impacts, including climate variability and extremes. However, comparable information concerning the performance of different UGI types to moderate such impacts is mostly lacking. This creates serious challenges for urban planners who need to decide on the most effective measures while considering spatial and administrative constraints. This study investigates how different types and quantities of UGI, i.e. trees, green roofs, and green facades, affect pedestrian thermal comfort. The study was applied to high-density residential areas under current and future climatic conditions. Climate change will on average increase afternoon Physiological Equivalent Temperature (PET) values by 2.4 K; however, this could be vastly reduced by different UGI scenarios. Planting trees had the strongest impact with an average PET reduction of 13% compared with existing vegetation. Trees shade open spaces and provide evapotranspirative cooling. Another valuable adaptation option is green facades, which have mitigating effects of 5%–10%. In contrast, the effects of green roofs were negligible. Our results indicate that increasing the share of green cover did not directly correspond to the magnitude of the PET reduction. Placing vegetation strategically in heat-exposed areas is more effective than just aiming at a high percentage of green cover. We conclude that our extensive comparative analysis provides empirical evidence to support UGI on the micro-scale and assists planners and decision-makers to effectively select and prioritise concrete measures to adapt to climate change.

Department/s

  • LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)

Publishing year

2016-12-01

Language

English

Pages

305-316

Publication/Series

Urban Forestry and Urban Greening

Volume

20

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Landscape Architecture
  • Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Keywords

  • Climate change adaptation
  • Ecosystem services
  • ENVI-met modelling
  • Naturebased solutions
  • Thermal comfort

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1618-8667