Your browser has javascript turned off or blocked. This will lead to some parts of our website to not work properly or at all. Turn on javascript for best performance.

The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Emily Boyd

Emily Boyd

Professor, Director, Docent

Emily Boyd

Understanding Poverty in Cash-crop Agro-forestry Systems : Evidence from Ghana and Ethiopia

Author

  • M. Hirons
  • E. Robinson
  • C. McDermott
  • A. Morel
  • R. Asare
  • E. Boyd
  • T. Gonfa
  • T. W. Gole
  • Y. Malhi
  • J. Mason
  • K. Norris

Summary, in English

This paper examines the linkages between cash-crop income and other dimensions of poverty to interrogate assumptions regarding the relationship between agricultural income and poverty alleviation. The analysis treats poverty as a multi-dimensional and socially disaggregated phenomenon. The paper employs a mixed methods approach to case studies of Ghana and Ethiopia to explore two critical issues. First, how income from cash crops is linked with other dimensions of poverty. Second, how income and land are socially disaggregated. The paper then draws on qualitative data to critically reflect on how poverty is understood within studied communities. The results show that some, but not all, indicators of poverty vary across income quartiles and that significant differences exist across social groups. The analysis suggests that although cash crops are essential, focusing on increasing income from cash crops will not necessarily have a predictable or progressive impact on wellbeing. Furthermore, the analysis highlights how contextual factors, such as the provision of communal services, the nature of land holdings and the quality of local governance mediate the potential poverty alleviating outcomes of income increases. Future development of sustainable intensification strategies should focus on the prevalence of trade-offs and the fundamental social relations underpinning poverty dynamics.

Department/s

  • LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)

Publishing year

2018-12-01

Language

English

Pages

31-41

Publication/Series

Ecological Economics

Volume

154

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Elsevier

Topic

  • Human Geography

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Cocoa
  • Coffee
  • Ethiopia
  • Ghana
  • Poverty

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 0921-8009