The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Kimberly Nicholas

Kimberly Nicholas

Senior Lecturer, Docent

Kimberly Nicholas

Key knowledge gaps to achieve global sustainability goals

Author

  • Matías E. Mastrángelo
  • Natalia Pérez-Harguindeguy
  • Lucas Enrico
  • Elena Bennett
  • Sandra Lavorel
  • Graeme S. Cumming
  • Dilini Abeygunawardane
  • Leonardo D. Amarilla
  • Benjamin Burkhard
  • Benis N. Egoh
  • Luke Frishkoff
  • Leonardo Galetto
  • Sibyl Huber
  • Daniel S. Karp
  • Alison Ke
  • Esteban Kowaljow
  • Angela Kronenburg-García
  • Bruno Locatelli
  • Berta Martín-López
  • Patrick Meyfroidt
  • Tuyeni H. Mwampamba
  • Jeanne Nel
  • Kimberly A. Nicholas
  • Charles Nicholson
  • Elisa Oteros-Rozas
  • Sebataolo J. Rahlao
  • Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne
  • Taylor Ricketts
  • Uttam B. Shrestha
  • Carolina Torres
  • Klara J. Winkler
  • Kim Zoeller

Summary, in English

Regional and global assessments periodically update what we know, and highlight what remains to be known, about the linkages between people and nature that both define and depend upon the state of the environment. To guide research that better informs policy and practice, we systematically synthesize knowledge gaps from recent assessments of four regions of the globe and three key themes by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. We assess their relevance to global sustainability goals and trace their evolution relative to those identified in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. We found that global sustainability goals cannot be achieved without improved knowledge on feedbacks between social and ecological systems, effectiveness of governance systems and the influence of institutions on the social distribution of ecosystem services. These top research priorities have persisted for the 14 years since the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Our analysis also reveals limited understanding of the role of indigenous and local knowledge in sustaining nature’s benefits to people. Our findings contribute to a policy-relevant and solution-oriented agenda for global, long-term social-ecological research.

Department/s

  • LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate

Publishing year

2019-10-28

Language

English

Pages

1115-1121

Publication/Series

Nature Sustainability

Volume

2

Issue

12

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group

Topic

  • Environmental Sciences
  • Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 2398-9629