Lennart Olsson
Professor, Docent
A pluralist approach to epistemic dilemmas in event attribution science
Author
Summary, in English
In recent years, a dispute has arisen within detection and attribution science concerning the appropriate methodology for associating individual weather events with anthropogenic climate change. In recent contributions, it has been highlighted that this conflict is seemingly misconstrued even by those participating in it and actually concerns a mixture of first and second order so-called inductive risk considerations—in short, it is about values and the role values should have in science. In this paper, we analyze this methodological conflict and examine the inductive risk considerations and argue that there is also another dimension to consider with respect to values that have to do with what detection and attribution science is for. We suggest a framework for understanding this as a kind of problem-feeding situation and thus an issue of problem–solution coordination between different contexts, where the problem is solved versus where the solution is put to use. This has important implications, not least for whether we should understand this conflict as a genuine methodological one or not.
Department/s
- Theoretical Philosophy
- LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)
Publishing year
2021-11-25
Language
English
Publication/Series
Climatic Change
Volume
169
Issue
1-2
Document type
Journal article
Publisher
Springer
Topic
- Philosophy
- Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Keywords
- Detection and attribution
- Inductive risk
- Pluralism
- Problem-feeding
- Type III errors
Status
Published
ISBN/ISSN/Other
- ISSN: 0165-0009