Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.
It is not the farmers who drive pesticide use – it is the lack of alternatives
Cecilia [dot] von_arnold [at] lucsus [dot] lu [dot] se (Cecilia von Arnold)
- published 2 March 2021
Pesticide use in is an urgent concern for human health and the environment. New studies on pesticide practices in Ugandan smallholder agriculture highlight the need to focus on drivers and impacts of unsafe pesticide use instead of putting blame on farmers.
Two recent research articles by LUCSUS researchers Elina Andersson and Ellinor Isgren show that while there is still a widespread notion that very few smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa use chemical inputs, data reveal that this is changing. In several countries including Uganda, studies have found that the large majority of the smallholder farmers regularly use pesticides on their crops.
Lack of alternatives, not knowledge
The amounts of pesticides used in sub-Saharan Africa smallholder agriculture are typically small by global standards, but the extent of unsafe practices and lack of market control make them very risky.
Our study shows that farmers are often assumed to be ‘unaware’ of risks with pesticides, but in fact, many are very worried about them.
– Our study shows that farmers are often assumed to be ‘unaware’ of risks with pesticides, but in fact, many are very worried about them. However, they see no other options, because crop pests pose such an immediate threat to their livelihoods, and they lack the support they need to manage this threat in a safe and sustainable way, says Elina Andersson.
They have studied who is exposed to risks along the whole ‘chain’ of pesticide use. That includes not just the spraying, but also purchasing, preparing, cleaning, and so on.
– We think it is important to ‘zoom out’ to the whole chain and its broader political and economic context in order to critically assess what deeper problems and drivers lie behind pesticide use, and ask questions about who is responsible and has capacity to act to change things, says Ellinor Isgren.
Ellinor Isgren and Elina Andersson have used a political ecology approach in their research to avoid the common mistake of framing ‘ignorant’ farmers as the main problem. They say that this type of framing amount to a kind of ‘victim-blaming’.
The have also strived to move beyond discussions of pesticide use that centers on “safe use” for example, on the use of protective gear, instead focusing in their research on highlighting alternative practices that strive to minimize the need of pesticides. The former can help address some problems, but leave many others unsolved, indicating that pesticides are one of many concrete examples of the need for more critical discussion around what ideas and whose interests steer agricultural development in sub-Saharan Africa.
Systematically monitor pesticide impacts
They further argue that pesticide impacts need to be more systematically monitored, and that there is an urgent need to address problems arising from informal trade, such as counterfeit products. This require resources, which are not provided unless there is sufficient acknowledgement of the problem.
– Compared to other regions of the world, there has been very little international attention to the relevance of these issues in African contexts. Hopefully, the political ecology and environmental justice lenses we use will open up new ways of thinking and talking about these issues amongst stakeholders, and of course amongst researchers, concludes Ellinor Isgren.
Ellinor Isgren is a researcher at Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS). She has a PhD in Sustainability Science and a background in Environmental Science and Agricultural Science. Her main research interest is the intersection of agriculture, development and sustainability, especially in smallholder contexts, and processes of social and political mobilization in rural areas.
Elina Andersson is a sustainability researcher, with a background in development studies, human ecology and gender studies. Her research is broadly situated in the field of political ecology and revolves around agriculture and food systems, rural development, and natural resource use and governance. Transdisciplinary collaboration and engagement with societal actors is a key motivational driver in her work.