
Henner Busch
Researcher, Docent

Fuel for revolt – moral arguments as delegitimation practices in Swedish fuel protests
Author
Summary, in English
This article examines the role of moral arguments in the delegitimation of transition policies. Previous research has highlighted attitudes and arguments that explain resistance against transition policies, including perceptions of unfairness; inefficiency and effectiveness; lack of trust; and ideology. This article provides further understanding of resistance to climate policies by zooming in on how social movements implicitly and explicitly use moral arguments to delegitimise low-carbon transition policies. Through a qualitative interview study with members of a Swedish social media movement against low-carbon transport policies, we analyse central arguments against policies; how moral considerations figure in them; and how these strengthen argumentative delegitimation practices against transition policies in the transport sector. We show how moral arguments serve to legitimise protests both by instilling an urgency in the cause and generalising the demands to delegitimise mainstream transition policies, and suggest that recognition of this may contribute to both better analysis and policies.
Department/s
- Department of Human Geography
- Transport and Roads
- Human Rights Studies
- LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies)
- LU Profile Area: Human rights
Publishing year
2024-03-24
Language
English
Pages
1109-1129
Publication/Series
Environmental Politics
Volume
33
Issue
6
Full text
- Available as PDF - 816 kB
- Download statistics
Document type
Journal article
Publisher
Routledge
Topic
- Human Geography
- Political Science (excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)
Keywords
- Bränsleupproret
- delegitimation
- fuel revolt
- just transition
- Moral arguments
- resistance
Status
Published
Project
- Navigating Justice Claims: Between Riots, Strikes and Business as Usual
ISBN/ISSN/Other
- ISSN: 0964-4016