The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

A woman, Magdalena Wiedermann. Photo.

Magdalena Wiedermann

Project Assistant

A woman, Magdalena Wiedermann. Photo.

Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework : Tensions and prospects

Author

  • Christopher M. Raymond
  • Miguel A. Cebrián-Piqueras
  • Erik Andersson
  • Riley Andrade
  • Alberto Arroyo Schnell
  • Barbara Battioni Romanelli
  • Anna Filyushkina
  • Devin J. Goodson
  • Andra Horcea-Milcu
  • Dana N. Johnson
  • Rose Keller
  • Jan J. Kuiper
  • Veronica Lo
  • María D. López-Rodríguez
  • Hug March
  • Marc Metzger
  • Elisa Oteros-Rozas
  • Evan Salcido
  • My Sellberg
  • William Stewart
  • Isabel Ruiz-Mallén
  • Tobias Plieninger
  • Carena J. van Riper
  • Peter H. Verburg
  • Magdalena M. Wiedermann
Show all

Summary, in English

The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a “relational turn” in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although “inclusivity” is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not only be acknowledged but softened and, in some cases, reframed when managing for biodiversity, equity, and justice goals. The results can improve stakeholder engagement in protected area management, ultimately supporting better implementation of global biodiversity targets.

Department/s

  • Quaternary Sciences
  • BECC: Biodiversity and Ecosystem services in a Changing Climate

Publishing year

2022-03-18

Language

English

Pages

252-264

Publication/Series

One Earth

Volume

5

Issue

3

Document type

Journal article review

Publisher

Cell Press

Topic

  • Environmental Sciences
  • Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Keywords

  • biodiversity conservation
  • ecosystem services
  • equity
  • inclusive conservation
  • plural valuation
  • protected area management
  • values

Status

Published

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 2590-3330